Did Cool Cats or Hot Dogs Swing the 2024 US Election?
1. Introduction: The Paws that Rocked the Ballot
When we think of voters shaping U.S. elections, images of bustling polls and political debates usually come to mind—not whiskers and wagging tails. But in the 2024 U.S. election, pets clawed their way into the political spotlight. Pet ownership, particularly whether you were a cat or dog person, became a surprising focus of the political narrative. Thanks to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 120,000 voters, we now know that furry friends may have influenced the future of the country.
So, which pet parent population had the upper paw?
The dogs claimed the day, but there’s much more to this tail...uh, tale.
2. The “Cat Lady” Campaign Moment
Best Pet Daily - the claws came out for Republican VP candidate JD Vance’s remark about “childless cat ladies”
Pet owners are not your typical voting bloc, but in 2024, they grabbed headlines.
The spark?
A controversial comment from Republican VP candidate JD Vance, labeling single women who own cats as “childless cat ladies.” As if pouring catnip on a fire, the remark set social media ablaze. Memes, hashtags, and heated debates ensued.
Enter Taylor Swift, a known cat enthusiast, who capitalized on the moment. In an Instagram post endorsing Kamala Harris, Swift proudly declared herself a “Childless Cat Lady” while posing with her feline companions. It was a PR masterstroke.
Harris quickly became the face of cat-loving voters—at least among women. Did it work? For female cat owners, absolutely. For everyone else? Not quite.
3. Cat Owners: A Slice of the Electorate
Did you know that only 15% of voters in the U.S. are exclusively cat owners? It’s a cozy corner of the electorate, but this group’s quirks made them stand out. Cat owners, especially women, leaned heavily toward Kamala Harris. According to AP VoteCast, about 60% of women with cats but no dogs supported her.
Why the Harris-cat connection? Part of it lies in values. Cat owners, often perceived as independent and nurturing, resonated with Harris’ message.
However, the gender divide was stark. Male cat owners? They largely backed Trump. It seems the stereotype of men disliking cats might not be so outdated after all.
4. The Dog Vote: A Bigger Bone to Chew On
Dogs, often referred to as “man’s best friend,” had a clear political preference in 2024. Representing 30% of voters, those who owned only dogs tilted firmly toward Trump. Among male dog owners, the Republican candidate captured 60% of the vote. Women dog owners were slightly more divided but still leaned red.
Why the canine loyalty to Trump? Could it be that dog owners often prioritize structure and loyalty—traits traditionally associated with conservative values?
Additionally, Republicans were more likely to identify as dog owners, with about half of all GOP-aligned voters reporting canine companions. Party loyalty, rather than pet preferences, may have been the true driving force here.
5. When Politics Goes to the Dogs (and Cats): Trump’s Springfield Comment
In a campaign season already brimming with eyebrow-raising moments, Donald Trump’s comments about Haitian immigrants in Springfield brought a controversial twist to the pet ownership narrative. At a rally, Trump claimed that immigrants in Ohio were “stealing and eating dogs and cats.” The statement, while unsubstantiated, sparked outrage and became a talking point on both sides of the political aisle.
From a political strategy perspective, this comment likely played on fear and cultural differences—a hallmark of divisive rhetoric. However, it also inadvertently highlighted the importance of pets in American households. For many voters, cats and dogs are not just companions; they’re family members. Suggesting such harm to beloved animals struck a nerve, but not necessarily in Trump’s favor. Many pet owners—regardless of party affiliation—reacted with disbelief or anger at the suggestion.
Did It Affect the Vote?
The data suggests Trump’s comment didn’t significantly shift voting patterns. Pet owners, particularly dog owners, still leaned Republican, likely due to longstanding party loyalty and broader cultural values. However, the controversy may have reinforced existing divides among pet-loving voters. Cat owners, who already leaned toward Kamala Harris, viewed the comment as further alienating. Women cat owners, in particular, reported a heightened dislike for the GOP following the remark, according to AP VoteCast.
For undecided voters, the statement likely faded into the noise of campaign theatrics. Yet it underscores a broader lesson for future candidates: tread carefully when invoking pets in political discourse. For better or worse, Americans are deeply protective of their furry friends, and any misstep can lead to a howl of backlash—or a collective hiss.
Pets as Political Symbols
The uproar around Trump’s comment also highlights the symbolic power of pets in politics. For cat and dog owners alike, pets represent trust, loyalty, and emotional connection. Politicians who appear dismissive or tone-deaf to this reality risk alienating voters who see their pets as integral to their identity. If anything, the Springfield incident served as a reminder that even the most offhand comments can stir the passions of America’s pet lovers
6. The Numbers Game: Cats vs. Dogs in Voter Share
Best Pet Daily - there was a difference in cat only voters, vs dog only voters, vs voters who own both cats and dogs!
Crunching the numbers reveals the stark difference between these two pet-loving populations. About two-thirds of Americans own a cat or dog, but dog owners far outnumber their feline-loving counterparts. This discrepancy made dog owners a much more influential bloc in the election.
Yet, there’s an interesting twist: voters who owned both cats and dogs were split almost evenly between the two candidates. This hybrid pet-parent demographic might be the ultimate swing voter group—proof that balance in pet ownership could reflect balance in political preferences.
7. Did the Pets Themselves Make an Appearance?
Unlike previous presidents who proudly displayed their pets on the campaign trail, neither Trump nor Harris had a pet during the 2024 election. This absence raised eyebrows and perhaps missed an opportunity to connect with pet-loving voters.
Historically, pets have been PR gold for presidents, from FDR’s beloved Fala to Obama’s Portuguese Water Dogs, Bo and Sunny.
Would a loyal Labrador or photogenic Persian have swayed the polls?
Maybe not, but it certainly wouldn’t have hurt. After all, nothing screams “approachable” like a candidate tossing a ball for their golden retriever.
8. The Social Media Influence of Cats and Dogs
If politics is a game of optics, pets might just be the ultimate pawns. In 2024, social media proved fertile ground for pet-centric campaigns and memes. Taylor Swift’s Instagram post embracing the “childless cat lady” label ignited a viral trend among cat owners, with hashtags like #CatsForKamala trending for weeks.
Meanwhile, the dog-loving side of the internet barked back, showcasing loyalty and humor through memes that painted Trump as the "alpha leader" dogs would follow. Political campaigns may not have explicitly targeted pet owners, but the organic online movement made it clear: cats and dogs were more than just companions—they were symbols of identity and values.
However, one question lingered: could candidates have done more? The lack of pets on either ticket might have limited their connection with pet lovers. Social media campaigns filled the void, but a furry face in campaign ads could have amplified the message.
9. Lessons for Future Campaigns: Purrs and Woofs in Politics
The 2024 election showed that pet ownership is more than a personal preference; it’s a cultural marker. Politicians aiming to connect with voters in future elections would do well to tap into this insight. Imagine campaign ads featuring rescues from animal shelters or pledges to improve pet welfare. These moves could attract both the cat-loving liberals and dog-loving conservatives.
Furthermore, candidates could take notes from petfluencers like Taylor Swift’s cats or Doug the Pug, who wield significant online clout. By partnering with these internet-famous pets, campaigns could bridge generational and political divides. If the phrase “puppy-kissing tour” isn’t already a thing, it should be.
10. The Numbers Game: Cats vs. Dogs in Voter Share
Understanding voter demographics is critical, and pet ownership offers a unique lens. Dog owners were the clear majority, accounting for about 30% of voters compared to just 15% for exclusive cat owners. Even more interesting, 20% of voters owned both cats and dogs, forming a significant swing bloc.
The stark difference in voter share underscores why Trump, who performed well with dog owners, edged out Harris, who appealed more to cat owners. This highlights an important lesson: while appealing to niche groups can energize a base, larger demographics often carry the day.
11. Did Pet Ownership Actually Influence the Vote?
Despite the cultural narratives, some might question whether pets truly influenced voting behavior. Political scientists often attribute voter preferences to deeper factors like party loyalty, economic concerns, and social issues. Yet, the 2024 election showed that personal identities, including pet ownership, can become symbolic of broader political ideologies.
AP VoteCast data supports this idea. Female cat owners, for example, were more likely to view Harris favorably even before the “cat lady” controversy. Similarly, male dog owners’ strong preference for Trump mirrored traditional GOP-aligned values. Pet ownership may not have swayed undecided voters, but it reinforced existing loyalties.
12. Conclusion: A Tail-Wagging Takeaway
Best Pet Daily - Cats and Dogs make such a difference in owners’ lives… it stands to reason a little of that is going to creep into voting preferences.
The 2024 election taught us that cats and dogs aren’t just companions—they’re cultural symbols with political resonance. Dog owners, the larger voting bloc, leaned heavily toward Trump, while cat owners, a smaller but vocal group, largely backed Harris. Both sides revealed the untapped potential of pets in political discourse.
Looking ahead, politicians might consider adopting more pet-friendly messaging. From pet welfare policies to campaign trail mascots, there’s plenty of room for paws-on-the-ground strategies. Because let’s face it—whether you’re Team Cat or Team Dog, everyone loves a good pet story.
FAQs
Did pet ownership directly impact the 2024 election?
While it’s hard to quantify the direct impact, pet ownership reflected broader cultural and political trends, influencing voting behaviors in subtle ways.Why did dog owners favor Trump over Harris?
Dog owners, particularly men, often align with conservative values like loyalty and structure, which resonate with the GOP platform.How did Taylor Swift’s endorsement affect the election?
Swift’s endorsement energized cat-loving women voters and brought cultural attention to Harris’ campaign. However, it had limited sway beyond this niche group.Are pet owners becoming a significant voting bloc?
With two-thirds of voters owning pets, the pet-loving population is undeniably influential, but it’s far from monolithic in political preferences.Could having a pet help future candidates?
Absolutely! Pets humanize candidates and create opportunities for relatability, making them a potentially powerful asset on the campaign trail.
